At least it looks like it to me. Intro political theory students at Michigan are, as part of their course work, posting to a group blog. Is that a cool teaching idea or what? Not bad stuff for first years–they’re even citing right (sort of, most of the time). Also not afraid to pick a fight. A response to the obligatory excerpt from The Prince:
Anybody else really frustrated with this reading? Not at all because it is hard, but because it is poorly argued. Machiavelli picks and chooses which arguments he wants to support, and no addressing some important claims that seem to need some backing. He also speaks in an enormous amount of generalizations and superlatives. He is constantly using terms like “always”, and “never”. These types of arguments lead him into self-contradiction. Anyone have any thoughts on this or noticed the same thing?